<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dexter R. Mullins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dextermullins.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dextermullins.com</link>
	<description>Online Portfolio and Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 01:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? by George Kent</title>
		<link>http://dextermullins.com/archives/283#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 01:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dextermullins.com/?p=283#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I feel fortunate that I found Mr. Mullins&#039; website and even more appreciative to read that
he tends to agree with me in comparing Mr. Assange to the &quot;Washington Post&quot; and &quot;New
York Times.&quot;  I don&#039;t tend to follow the news but I would have had to be dead not to have
heard of Mr. Assange and WikiLeaks with regard to the leaked cables and the subsequent 
witch hunt for Assange.

During Watergate and the Pentagon Papers outrage I was a military officer. While I took the
position that the culprit(s) should not have leaked the the documents I certainly felt the reporters
and their newspapers were just as guilty for printing classified documents.  I worked in Minute Man Missiles and held a top secret clearance, and so I took those things very seriously.

But be that as it may, the reporters and newspapers were not held accountable for any wrong doing.  When I learned about the whole WikiLeaks affair my mind raced back to the Pentagon Papers and I felt Mr. Assange should be treated the same as those newspapers, their reporters, editors and publishers.  I cannot see any difference and if I read Mr. Mullins correctly, I think he feels the same as I.

Just a few days ago Assange was awarded the Sydney Peace Foundation&#039;s gold medal for &#039;championing people&#039;s right to know&#039;.  He received the award in London on May 11, 2011, the same day a federal grand jury held its first session to determine if Assange should be tried for espionage.

While I don&#039;t condone the soldier&#039;s actions nor WikiLeaks publishing the documents, there are just too many precedents established to justify convicting Assange or his organization.

I might add that Daniel Ellsberg was not convicted for his part in the Pentagon Papers which were declassified 44 years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel fortunate that I found Mr. Mullins&#8217; website and even more appreciative to read that<br />
he tends to agree with me in comparing Mr. Assange to the &#8220;Washington Post&#8221; and &#8220;New<br />
York Times.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t tend to follow the news but I would have had to be dead not to have<br />
heard of Mr. Assange and WikiLeaks with regard to the leaked cables and the subsequent<br />
witch hunt for Assange.</p>
<p>During Watergate and the Pentagon Papers outrage I was a military officer. While I took the<br />
position that the culprit(s) should not have leaked the the documents I certainly felt the reporters<br />
and their newspapers were just as guilty for printing classified documents.  I worked in Minute Man Missiles and held a top secret clearance, and so I took those things very seriously.</p>
<p>But be that as it may, the reporters and newspapers were not held accountable for any wrong doing.  When I learned about the whole WikiLeaks affair my mind raced back to the Pentagon Papers and I felt Mr. Assange should be treated the same as those newspapers, their reporters, editors and publishers.  I cannot see any difference and if I read Mr. Mullins correctly, I think he feels the same as I.</p>
<p>Just a few days ago Assange was awarded the Sydney Peace Foundation&#8217;s gold medal for &#8216;championing people&#8217;s right to know&#8217;.  He received the award in London on May 11, 2011, the same day a federal grand jury held its first session to determine if Assange should be tried for espionage.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t condone the soldier&#8217;s actions nor WikiLeaks publishing the documents, there are just too many precedents established to justify convicting Assange or his organization.</p>
<p>I might add that Daniel Ellsberg was not convicted for his part in the Pentagon Papers which were declassified 44 years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why every journalist should know about metrics by Tweets that mention New blog post about why you should know your metrics: #cuj11 and are mentioned -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://dextermullins.com/archives/316#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention New blog post about why you should know your metrics: #cuj11 and are mentioned -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 03:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dextermullins.com/?p=316#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Megan Berry and Eli. Eli said: @darrenrovell An article about journalists &amp; Twitter-metrics: http://is.gd/jMCUk &amp; here&#039;s your powerful @Klout score: http://is.gd/jMD75 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Megan Berry and Eli. Eli said: @darrenrovell An article about journalists &amp; Twitter-metrics: <a href="http://is.gd/jMCUk" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/jMCUk</a> &amp; here&#039;s your powerful @Klout score: <a href="http://is.gd/jMD75" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/jMD75</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? by Who&#039;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? &#124; Dexter R. Mullins &#124; World Media Information</title>
		<link>http://dextermullins.com/archives/283#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Who&#039;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? &#124; Dexter R. Mullins &#124; World Media Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dextermullins.com/?p=283#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source: Who&#039;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? &#124; Dexter R. Mullins [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source: Who&#039;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? | Dexter R. Mullins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? by Tweets that mention Who’s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? &#124; Dexter R. Mullins -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://dextermullins.com/archives/283#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Who’s afraid of the big bad WikiLeaks? &#124; Dexter R. Mullins -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dextermullins.com/?p=283#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ahmed Al Omran, Dexter R. Mullins. Dexter R. Mullins said: New Blog Post: &quot;Who&#039;s afraid of the big bad wikileaks?&quot; http://dextermullins.com/archives/283 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ahmed Al Omran, Dexter R. Mullins. Dexter R. Mullins said: New Blog Post: &quot;Who&#039;s afraid of the big bad wikileaks?&quot; <a href="http://dextermullins.com/archives/283" rel="nofollow">http://dextermullins.com/archives/283</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

